HOT BLAST: On the cover of Rolling Stone
Jul 17, 2013 | 1517 views |  0 comments | 18 18 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Rolling Stone magazine has never shied away from controversy or the causes its editors support, but its decision to put Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev on the cover of its upcoming issue has, if anything, gained the mag lots of attention.

From a journalism standpoint, there shouldn't be any real criticism of a magazine diving into the background of a young man who went from a fairly normal teenager to that of an accused terrorist. We need to know more about how that happened.

The problem is that the cover of the Rolling Stone is a landmark piece of journalistic real estate. Songs have been written about it. Careers in music and entertainment have been made or broken because of it. Putting Tsarnaev on the cover, in the manner in which the magazine did, invites controversy.

I don't have a problem with it. If you're going to do a story on an accused bomber, using his photograph is fair game.

However, others disagree, as you can see from this story in the Boston Herald, which is similar to many across the country today. The Rolling Stone editors have responded and explained the story. And, for what it's worth, here's a look at several other controversial Rolling Stone covers through the years. (Warning: The covers aren't child- or work-friendly.)

Meanwhile, some retail outlets have already decided not to carry the magazine.

-- Phillip Tutor
Comments must be made through Facebook
No personal attacks
No name-calling
No offensive language
Comments must stay on topic
No infringement of copyrighted material

Friends to Follow

Today's Events

event calendar

post a new event

Saturday, April 19, 2014